Stanley Feld M.D., FACP, MACE Menu

Permalink:

Dear President –Elect Obama : Part 2

 

Stanley Feld M.D.,FACP,MACE

In my first letter I said repairing the healthcare system was simple. I pointed out the problems in our industrialized food system and its impact on the environment, our energy dependence and our healthcare systems’ costs. The industrial food industry contributes at least 300 billion dollars in increased cost to the healthcare system.

A healthcare cost saving of at least $150 billion dollars could occur if the complications of chronic disease could be decreased by 50%. The practices of chronic disease management using prevention of disease and evidence based medicine makes this promise possible.

The problems in the healthcare system are great. The initial question is who is at fault. All the stakeholders are at fault. The stakeholders are the healthcare insurance industry, the government, the hospital systems, the physicians and most importantly, the patients.

The primary stakeholders are patients with physicians a close second. Without patients or physicians we would not have a healthcare system. Healthcare insurance companies, the government, and hospitals are secondary stakeholders.

The healthcare insurance industry has turned out to be the biggest villain. It has taken advantage of the dysfunction of the government and weakness of patients and physicians as lobbying groups. The control of power in healthcare is in the hands of the healthcare insurance industry. The rules and regulations must be changed so that patients gain control of the healthcare system.

The healthcare insurance industry has abused this power. It has manipulated congress and the administration to serve its own vested interest.

The result is grotesque salaries for executives and excess administrative fees. Our healthcare system is supposed to be for the benefit of the consumers (patients), not for the benefit of the healthcare insurance industry.

The healthcare industry has restricted access to care and has made interpretation of payment for care impossible. It has decreased physicians’ reimbursement and withheld payments for services rendered without explanation or justification.

The government outsources the administration of Medicare and Medicaid to the healthcare insurance industry. The government calls them vendors. There are many examples of healthcare insurance industry abuse of the healthcare system. Medicare Part D fees for 2009 have just been published with the consent of the government. These new fees are abusive to seniors. It is difficult to understand the government regulators reasoning.

Seniors on fixed incomes need a reliable drug coverage plan. The healthcare insurance industry worked for four years to figure out a system that would be to its advantage and not the seniors’ advantage.

The government subsidizes Medicare Part D. Yet the government does not have the right to negotiate drug prices. I have exposed the abuses of Medicare Part D in detail. The abuses stem from the high deductibles and a doughnut hole that does not cover drug costs after a certain amount is spent by seniors for drugs.

Humana and United Healthcare rushed to insure for Part D because they visualized the money making opportunity quicker than most. Both companies also realized that as healthcare insurance premiums increased in the private sector there would be more uninsured consumers. The less lives covered the lower its profit. Therefore a drug plan leveraged in their favor sponsored by the government would cover the decrease in profit in the private sector.

United Healthcare paid AARP over 4 billion dollars to be their exclusive carrier for AARP senior members. There is no shortage of complaining from AARP’s seniors. The payment for sponsorship has not been fully disclosed nor it’s ethics been investigated.

UnitedHealthcare made a profit of $4.7 billion dollars last year from Medicare Part D at patients’ and the government expense. Despite this profit the monthly fee has increased over the last three years from $15 to $27 and in 2009 to $38 a month with the government’s permission.

UnitedHealthcare convinced government regulators they needed a premium increase in order to cover a shortfall. UnitedHealthcare compromised by changing the drug benefit before hitting the doughnut from $2300 to $2700 and lowering the amount you have to spend getting out of the doughnut from $5200 to $4700.

A careful analysis of the math is in favor of the healthcare insurance companies. Seniors have flocked to Wal-Mart and others to buy $4.00 per month generics paying cash and not using Medicare Part D “insurance”. They are paying cash for rather than putting their prescriptions on their Medicare Part D plan. If they put the prescription on Medicare Part D their co-pay would be $6.00 for a month’s supply of medication rather than $4.00 to Wal-Mart. The prescription could be charged between $20 and $50 toward the doughnut even though the healthcare insurance company probably only paid Wal-Mart $4.00. None of these prices are transparent.

President-elect Obama, the problems with Medicare Part D would be a good place to start to understand the abuse of this non transparent system. Similar abuses occur with government outsourcing Medicare Part A and B and probably government employee benefit Part C.

This is a tremendous waste of government and consumer resources for the benefit of the healthcare insurance industry. Real price transparency is essential if you are going to make any progress in reducing the cost of the healthcare system.

Real price transparency in this case means: What is the cost of the drug to the pharmacy? What is the cost of the drug to the healthcare insurance company? How is the price of the drug calculated toward the doughnut? How does the government subsidize the healthcare insurance companies for administration of the program? What would be a reasonable profit for the healthcare insurance industry?

I suggest before your administration gets busy penalizing patients with decreased access to care and physicians with decreased reimbursement, your healthcare advisors should dig deeply into the abuses of the real villain in the healthcare system, the healthcare insurance industry.

The opinions expressed in the blog “Repairing The Healthcare System” are, mine and mine alone.

  • Alan Shimel

    You are right on here Stan. Government approved hikes in premiums should be pegged to the profit these insurance companies are making. Crying with two loafs of bread under each arm is just not right!!

  • Darrell Pruitt

    Dr. Feld, it is refreshing to hear your voice. Very few have the courage to speak up about ambitious stakeholders in healthcare – stakeholders who would have consumers believe that bureaucrats, healthcare IT executives and insurance MBAs are as critical to healthcare delivery as doctors and patients.
    With all due respect, Dr. Feld, I see that someone has successfully taught you to thoughtlessly accept the label “stakeholder” for yourself and your patients. The label you were pushed into buying brings doctors and patients down to the vendor’s level of importance. It is an old stakeholder trick based on semantics. It has to do with spin and other stakeholder PR talents. These guys are slick. And they are empowered.
    On December 21, 2007, the National Committee for Vital and Health Statistics (NCVHS) – an assortment of stakeholders who tell HHS what HHS likes to hear – submitted a letter recommending actions for “Enhanced Protections for Uses of Health Data” to Secretary Michael Leavitt encouraging the elimination of the term “secondary uses” for patient health records.
    “NCVHS observes that ‘secondary use’ of health data is an ill-defined term and urges abandoning it in favor of precise description for each use of health data.”
    The subtle underlying rationalization is that all stakeholders, including doctors and patients, are equally important in a democracy. Since doctors and patients are intentionally poorly represented in stakeholder committees that report happy things to the HHS, such as the NCVHS, CCHIT and the future AHIC Successor Inc., stakeholders unanimously win their power in fair democratic fashion, again and again. And that is why one can expect things to fall short of swell for doctors and patients.
    We are not stakeholders. As doctors and patients, we are principles and we must aggressively fight for the welfare of patients, just like you are doing. Otherwise patients have no representation at all.
    We must be transparent and doctors must be paid fairly. This is too harsh for some to imagine, much less to say out loud, but consumers should be aware that ethics is not free, and you get what you pay for. There are no bargains in spite of what glossy managed care folders advertise.
    Patients and their doctors are principles, not stakeholders. Healthcare is not a natural, renewable resource and mandates are not windfall profits. Patients always suffer the final bill.
    Keep up the good work, Dr. Feld. We’ll overcome stakeholders. We must. Darrell K. Pruitt DDS

  • Thanks for leaving a comment, please keep it clean. HTML allowed is strong, code and a href.

Permalink:

To My Readers: A Call To Action!

 

Stanley Feld M.D.,FACP,MACE

I believe President-elect Obama is a smart fellow and wants to do the right thing for all healthcare consumers regardless of class. His decisions will only be as good as the information he receives. Some of his published policies are correct and some are wrong.

His advisors are focused on manipulating the payment systems as they attempt to provide universal healthcare. They are not focused on the abuse by all the stakeholders in the system including patients. Their focus has to be redirected to the abuses in the healthcare system and the repair of those abuses.

I believe in a free enterprise system with appropriate rules and regulations and not in socialized medicine. The rules and regulations have to be in favor of the consumer and not the healthcare insurance industry, the drug companies, the hospital systems or the government. Consumer’s in a price transparent environment with appropriate incentives will make sure they are treated fairly by their physicians.

Patients should control their healthcare dollar and be responsible for their health and healthcare needs in a totally transparent environment. Price transparency and not price controls must be negotiated for the consumer by the government and the healthcare insurance industry.

If patients were motivated by incentives such as retaining healthcare dollars not spent we could eliminate the complications of chronic diseases as well as the obscene administrative costs and excess profits of the healthcare insurance industry.

As readers of my blog you are well aware of my positions as well as the logic of these positions.

President-elect Obama has asked us, ordinary citizens, for input. I am asking for your help in getting these positions before President-elect Obama, his healthcare advisors and your congresspersons before they make a mistake. Below are links to President-elect Obama and your congresspersons.

Thank you,

Stanley Feld M.D.,FACP,MACE

  • kayla

    I am very interested in the how care system our son was born with esophageal atresia and down syndrome and other complications. S o strive to stay up on all of this.

  • Thanks for leaving a comment, please keep it clean. HTML allowed is strong, code and a href.

Permalink:

Dear President-elect Obama

 

Stanley Feld M.D.,FACP,MACE

Our healthcare system is a mess. Medicare and social security in its present form will result in a 100 trillion dollar a year deficit in 75 years. The solution to Repairing the Healthcare System is relatively simple. The key to the solution is social responsibility by all stakeholders involved in the healthcare system and individual responsibility by the consumers and potential consumers of healthcare.

Unfortunately, stakeholders will not voluntarily be socially responsible and the consumer will assume responsibility only with significant education and incentives. The goal of remaining healthy is subverted advertising of the food industry. The food industry’s advertising has to be redirected to consumer education and not consumer self destruction.

Over the past 21/2 years I have analyzed the problems in the healthcare system and presented the solutions to the problems in my blog “Repairing the Healthcare System”. I will review highlights of the problems and the solutions. I have provided links for you to study.

You have promised you will govern for the benefit of people with input from the people and not special interests. I hope this is true.

You will not be able to make the appropriate decisions without appropriate input. I hope my review will come before you. I am asking my readers to help get it before you.

Unfortunately no one asked for the opinion of practicing physicians. The focus of all healthcare policy “experts” is economics.

The problems with the healthcare system are broader than economics. The problems are problems that results from the interrelationship of other societal problems.

Eighty per cent of the healthcare dollars are spent on the complications of chronic diseases. The eighty percent cost to the healthcare system is one trillion six hundred million dollars a year.

You are correct when you say you want to prevent chronic diseases. This is harder than it sounds because chronic disease management is not done as an extension of a physician’s care.

Several chronic diseases such as diabetes mellitus and heart disease are mostly a direct result of obesity. The obesity epidemic is interconnected with our energy policy and energy subsidies, farm policies and subsidies, environmental policy and conditioned attitudes toward fast food.

Obesity leads to Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Walk into any Coronary Care Unit in the nation and 80% of the patients with myocardial infarctions are obese and have diabetes mellitus. The complications of Diabetes Mellitus cost the healthcare system 160 billion dollars a year. Eliminating obesity will reduce that incidence of diabetes mellitus by at least 50%. Cheap manufactured food subsided by the government consumes 19% of the fossil fuel we use and results in more that 75% of the obesity in this country.

Michael Pollan points out the problem with or entire food supply system and the impact it has on healthcare, the environment and energy.

“Which brings me to the deeper reason you will need not simply to address food prices but to make the reform of the entire food system one of the highest priorities of your administration: unless you do, you will not be able to make significant progress on the health care crisis, energy independence or climate change.”

The three problems your presidency has inherited are tightly connected. The repair of each problem has to must be done in a creative way that aligns all the stakeholders incentive with consumers and their health and wellness being the major stakeholder.

Pollen goes on to say “Unlike food, these are issues you did campaign on — but as you try to address them you will quickly discover that the way we currently grow, process and eat food in America goes to the heart of all three problems and will have to change if we hope to solve them.

Mr. Pollan’s point is the way we grow food and manufacture food stuff is a major reason for obesity and pollution leading to the complications of chronic disease. This results in a 1.6 trillion dollar cost to the healthcare system. It is also major reason for our energy dependence and climate change. All America needs is the will to change. The science is available.

It is going to require a lot of public and congressional education. Congress will be harder to educate than the public because congress is driven by vested interest lobbying. You must help the public create a greater voice than the special interests. The public will then lobby the congress.

Michael Pollan says “the 20th-century industrialization of agriculture has increased the amount of greenhouse gases emitted by the food system by an order of magnitude; chemical fertilizers (made from natural gas), pesticides (made from petroleum), farm machinery, modern food processing and packaging and transportation have together transformed a system that in 1940 produced 2.3 calories of food energy for every calorie of fossil-fuel energy it used into one that now takes 10 calories of fossil-fuel energy to produce a single calorie of modern supermarket food. Put another way, when we eat from the industrial-food system, we are eating oil and spewing greenhouse gases. “

Michael Pollan's is a brilliant interpreter of farm policy. He should have significant input in your administration. He should perhaps be nominated for Secretary of Agriculture.

Thomas Friedman should be read carefully. He could provide input into determining the resources need to create the paradigm shift necessary to cure the underlying problems of our environment.

America’s coal resource is abundant and cheap. America’s energy companies would love to expand coal burning plants. Beware of the promise of clean coal burning plants. Dirty coal burning plants result in environmental pollution with soot, sulfur dioxide, mercury and nitrous oxides. The carbon dioxide footprint is currently not required to be measured. The Environmental Protection Agency does not have a CO2 emission restriction policy in place. Without counting the harmful long term effects of CO2 emissions on climate change, coal burning plants presently result in the chronic disease complications of asthma and chronic obstructive lung disease. These diseases result in a one hundred billion dollar a year cost to the healthcare system. These diseases and their complications can be reduced by at least 50% with an effective clean air policy.

My review letter to you is longer than I anticipated. You have very hard decisions to make but if your intent is to be transformational these decisions will be necessary.

The reformatting of the payment system for physicians is not going to accomplish anything but dispirit the medical profession and diminish the effectiveness of a necessary workforce. Physicians are not the villain. I will review who the real villain/villains are.

The opinions expressed in the blog “Repairing The Healthcare System” are, mine and mine alone.

  • Jackson-food

    America has also a problem of food allergy. An allergy to food is when you have an adverse physical reaction to a food item after eating it. Health care department has to take care of quality and healthy food. Thank you!!

  • Coal Processing

    Hi this is the use of coal and lignite to produce liquid transport fuels has been given new importance with the looming “peak oil” crisis.

  • Thanks for leaving a comment, please keep it clean. HTML allowed is strong, code and a href.

Permalink:

Aetna CEO Urges Mandatory Health Care Coverage

 

Stanley Feld M.D.,FACP,MACE

He says
it would lower costs

Of course the CEO of Aetna would want mandatory healthcare coverage with the
government providing a subsidy to consumers to buy healthcare insurance. The
more lives insured the more profit his healthcare insurance company would
make.

“Americans should be required to buy health
insurance
, bringing healthier people into plans that will help
bring down costs, the chairman of one of the nation's largest private insurance
companies told a Detroit audience Tuesday.”

This is obviously self serving. Massachusetts
bought into this concept only to see the premiums and state subsidies go up
.
As long as the healthcare insurance industry’s administrative costs are opaque
and not transparent the healthcare premium costs will not go down.

A mandatory system misses the point of the dysfunction in the healthcare
system. The healthcare insurance industry would become more powerful. The
healthcare insurance industry’s increased control over the healthcare system
would add to the dysfunction.

The
incentives of all stakeholders must be aligned and consumers must be in control
of their healthcare dollar and not the healthcare insurance industry
. The
insurance company should be in control of the dollars spent after $6000
dollars.

“A mandatory system would help bring down costs and end a problem known
in the industry as cherry-picking — enrolling healthy applicants and rejecting
those with prior medical problems — because costs and risks would be spread
over a larger group of people, Williams said.”

The
cherry pickers are the healthcare industry.
The healthcare industry is
required to insure people in an employer group. However, if sick people are in
the group the group premium is increased. Cherry picking occurs when an
individual tries to buy insurance. If the consumer is 55 years old and recently
unemployed he is unable to get insurance if he has hypertension and diabetes. If
he could get insurance the premium would be high and he would be paying with
after tax dollars. The healthcare insurance industry would love every healthy 20
year old to be insured.

Mr. Williams has produced a smoke screen to give states the idea that they
should make health insurance mandatory. He has no interest in repairing the
system because that would decrease Aetna’s profit.

Williams is also in favor of:

“• Selling health insurance across state lines, a proposal favored by
Republican presidential candidate John McCain.”

The healthcare insurance industry has lobbied John McCain to take this
position. This form of deregulation would have adverse effects on the healthcare
system. State
Boards of Insurance can eliminate insurance abuse by refusing to grant a health
insurance carrier a permit to sell insurance in its state because of abuse
.
So far state boards of insurance have not imposed this penalty. Healthcare
insurance company abuse has only been punished by weak and insignificant
monetary fines. John McCain would eliminate this potential protection for
consumers.

“• Expanding access of those now eligible for Medicare and Medicaid
programs.”

John McCain would also like to eliminate the Medicare entitlement.
He would like to move all Medicare patients to private sector run Medicare
Advantage program. The Bush Administration has increased the subsidy to the
healthcare industry for Medicare Advantage $3,600 per patients. The
healthcare insurance industry has increased profit last year by over 5 billion
dollars from the Medicare Advantage program with only 20% of the potential
patients being enrolled. .

"No candidate has the right answer," Williams said.

Neither candidate's program suits Mr. Williams’ goal of increasing his
massive profits.

John
McCain essentially has no program.
Mr. Williams and Aetna would have to
continue to build up it power slowly.

President-elect Barack
Obama has a program that will fail
because it is outsourced to the
healthcare industry. In my next post I will explain how he can convert his
healthcare plan to a healthcare plan that will succeed. 

The opinions
expressed in the blog “Repairing The Healthcare System” are, mine and mine
alone.

  • Glenn

    Stanley, you are absolutely right. Aetna is in no way interested in healthcare reform as their own web site makes clear when you cannot select an NP as a primary care provider, even when the only healthcare provider in 50 miles is an NP. Aetna is interested in government subsedies and that is all. Actual healthcare is irrelevant. Sad that so many people seem to think that insurance coverage and healthcare are the same thing.

  • Thanks for leaving a comment, please keep it clean. HTML allowed is strong, code and a href.

Permalink:

How to Take American Health Care From Worst to First

Stanley Feld M.D.,FACP,MACE

 

Billy Beane, Newt Gingrich, and John Kerry wrote an op-ed piece in the New York Times October 24th that brought into focus several fuzzy thoughts I have had about Newt Gingrich and John Kerry’s concept of e-prescriptions and electronic medical records.

My first thought is they do not have an in depth understanding of information technology nor an understanding of medical practice or the medical profession.

Newt Gingrich sounds good sometimes but on close inspection in only sounds good because he picks one aspect of a problem and frames it in a simple solution.

John Kerry has the appearance of being an intellectual but does not understand the complexity of the problem or the mentality of the medical profession.

This op-ed article about electronic medical records demonstrates both these “experts’ ” weaknesses. I refer you to my electronic medical record series of articles.

Electronic Medical Records are a great idea and will save money, increase quality of care (after we define improved quality of care) and avoid medical errors. The great issue is how to execute the implementation of the electronic medical record that is fully functional.

Messer’s Beane, Gingrich and Kerry make a tepid argument comparing baseball’s data driven information revolution to medicine’s need for an information revolution.

“In the past decade, baseball has experienced a data-driven information revolution. Numbers-crunchers now routinely use statistics to put better teams on the field for less money. Our overpriced, underperforming health care system needs a similar revolution.”

There is no argument in the medical profession that we need a robust information technology revolution. In fact the medical profession is slowly evolving toward the goal of information driven medical care. The op-ed authors sound like they have made a revolutionary discovery.

Evidence-based health care would not strip doctors of their decision-making authority nor replace their expertise. Instead, data and evidence should complement a lifetime of experience, so that doctors can deliver the best quality care at the lowest possible cost.

Like most politicians Gingrich and Kerry do not get to the basic questions. The main issue is how can our healthcare system distribute a uniform information software system, at an affordable cost, with an education module that decreases the steepness of the learning curve for physicians? How can the software be compelling to physicians so they will abandon their ineffective software? How can the data produced by the software be rewarding rather than punitive to physicians?

How can the data be a teaching experience to physicians rather than a test of a physician’s ability that could be used to decrease physician reimbursement in an environment of stakeholder mistrust?

Many physicians have invested heavily in electronic medical records only to discover that the electronic medical record they purchased can not be fully functional.

“Another example is Intermountain Healthcare, a nonprofit health-care system in Utah, where 80 percent of the care is based on evidence. Treatment data is collected by electronic medical records. The data is analyzed by researchers, and the best practices are then incorporated into the clinical process, resulting in far better quality care at a cost that is one-third less than the national average. (Disclosure: Intermountain Healthcare is a member of Mr. Gingrich’s organization.)”

I challenge the authors to provide the data that the Intermountain Healthcare electronic medical record is fully functional. I challenge the statement that Intermountain Healthcare has data based evidence of “better quality care at a cost that is one-third less than the national average.” The investment of an EMR started in 2005 by Intermountain Healthcare will be $100 million dollars over ten years. How many clinics can afford $100 million dollars over a ten year time period?

Our healthcare system should have all physicians practicing data driven evidence based medicine. The question is how do you produce a uniform electronic medical record that is fully functional and affordable for all physicians? The authors do not offer a solution. My article on the Ideal Electronic Medical Record offers viable solutions to the problem.

 

The opinions expressed in the blog “Repairing The Healthcare System” are, mine and mine alone.

  • Adam

    your posting is very inspiring…

  • EMR

    I think it’d take a lot more work than that. But it’s definitely a good start.

  • Thanks for leaving a comment, please keep it clean. HTML allowed is strong, code and a href.

Permalink:

Governor Jindal: Health care should be left to patients, doctors

 

Stanley Feld M.D.,FACP,MACE

 

Governor Bobby Jindal of Louisiana is about to unveil an overhauled Medicaid program for his state. It remains to be seen whether he is going to do it correctly and whether the federal government will support him.

He has hinted that he understands the healthcare system’s problems. Governor Jindal is a Republican governor. The Republican Party’s mandate is to transfer all entitlement programs to the private sector. The result will not be favorable to patients or physicians. Total control of Medicaid by the healthcare insurance industry would mean less access to care and greater profits for the healthcare insurance industry.

“Louisiana’s efforts to improve health-care outcomes must put more power in the hands of doctors and patients and should also include broad public health measures, such as improving nutrition and boosting physical education requirements in schools, Gov. Bobby Jindal said Wednesday.”

The social contract of medical care should be between the doctor and the patient. It should not be between a third party such as the government or the healthcare insurance industry and the physicians or patients.

The government should be responsible for broad public health measures such developing a culture of good nutrition and physical activity in the schools and public service campaigns to combat obesity and promote healthy living.

“It really is looking at health, not just health care,” Jindal said, citing Louisiana’s higher rates of diabetes, obesity and asthma as chronic conditions that can be improved through a sharper focus on public health.”

“Without providing specifics, Jindal said he would favor legislation to encourage more physical education in schools and improve nutrition in school vending machines and lunches.”

Governor Jindal’s plan to revise Medicaid is called Louisiana Health First. Early indications are that it will be a sweeping overhaul of the ineffective Medicaid system. Early indications are that it will not support the concept of a social contract between patients and physicians.

“The plan, dubbed Louisiana Health First, would turn over large chunks of the program to privately run managed-care organizations, which would oversee the health care of as many as 380,000 residents, mainly children.”

We have seen that managed care does not work. It is really managed costs. Managed care usually restricts access to care in order to manage costs.

Governor Jindal is right in the public health area but dead wrong with his managed care organization proposal. He will just be providing a money making vehicle for managed care organizations (healthcare insurance industry) while not improving the health of the people of Louisiana.

“Jindal said he hopes to get the changes approved before the Bush administration leaves office Jan. 20, as the change to a new president could delay the state’s plans. “We simply don’t want to start over from scratch,” Jindal said”.

He wants the change before January 20th 2008. He would love to sneak in a plan that would outsource state and federally subsidize Medicaid to managed care organizations. The Republican Party’s goal is to abandon entitlement programs and hand them over to the private sector (healthcare insurance industry).

President Bush tried to privatize social security. If he was successful it would have been a disaster given the present financial crisis. The President is in the process of privatizing Medicare with the Medicare Advantage program. The administration is paying a premium to the healthcare insurance industry to accomplish the transfer at the expense of taxpayers and seniors. Massachusetts is privatizing universal care and experiencing large cost overruns.They will all fail.

Who do you think will lose? Patients and physician will lose. The only reform program that will work will be to provide incentives for consumers to be in control of their healthcare dollar along with a reward system for consumers if they responsibly maintain their health.

  • handout

    hi…
    thank’s for your posting
    and happy to visit your blog…
    please visit OUR PAGE ok!!
    thank you…

  • Thanks for leaving a comment, please keep it clean. HTML allowed is strong, code and a href.

Permalink:

Politicians Give Me A Headache: Part 3

 

Stanley Feld M.D.,FACP,MACE

As the Presidential campaign comes to a close the important issues of the campaign get blurred or discarded. Healthcare reform is one of those issues.

In the past I enjoyed the clarity of thinking of the Wall Street Journal editorial page. Lately it has adopted a patina of fuzzy thinking and muckraking. It frequently misses the essential issues in the name of free enterprise. Last week Newt Gingrich said something intelligent. He said the Republican party should abandon the notion of anti-government for the notion of government involvement with competent management. Barack Obama has hinted that he gets it. 

John McCain does not have a healthcare plan. His healthcare plan has one tactic but is not a strategy to repair the healthcare system. It is an anti-government tactic. An effective healthcare plan must have many tactics. The tactics must align the agendas of all the stakeholders. The most important agenda is the medical care provided to consumers. John McCain’s tactic keeps control of the healthcare industry in the hands of the healthcare insurance companies. The healthcare insurance industry is the stakeholder that has abused the healthcare system. Its abuse has led to the abuse by other stakeholders.

John McCain’s healthcare tax credit is supposed to permit the self-insured to pay for healthcare insurance with pre-tax dollars as opposed to post tax dollars. Employer provided healthcare insurance presently pays for employee insurance with pretax dollars.

Equal tax treatment for employers and self employed should have been instituted years ago. John McCain’s non healthcare plan has many problems. His tax credit is not large enough compared to the cost of healthcare insurance. His plan will give employers an excuse to abandon providing healthcare insurance for its employees. The result long term will be an increase in the number of uninsured. A worker earning $40,000 cannot afford $12,000 a year for healthcare insurance for his family even if $5,000 is tax free. The problem is the cost of insurance and the cost of care.

The Wall Street Journal editorial spends time criticizing the Obama campaign for John McCain’s deficiency.

“One underreported story of this election is how heavily John McCain has been damaged by Barack Obama’s television ad assault on his health-care plan. A lot of voters seem to believe the Democrat when he says that Mr. McCain wants to deny them coverage or bankrupt them with crushing hospital bills.”

Barack Obama’s television advertisement is correct. The result of Mr. McCain’s “healthcare plan” will be just that because “affordable plans” will be sold that do not provide adequate healthcare coverage. We are seeing it now with higher co-pays, higher deductibles and underinsured. The healthcare insurance industry’s goal is to maintain high profits without regard for other stakeholders’ needs.

The Journal spends most of the article criticizing Jason Furman, who is Mr. Obama’s economic policy director because he agrees with Mr. McCain’s tactic. John McCain’s tactic is a tax credit for the self employed that is long overdue. Jason Furman does not agree with the taxable income portion of employer provided healthcare insurance. John McCain’s tax credit, taxable income proposal would result in the elimination of employer provided healthcare insurance.

The problem is healthcare reform needs more than one tactic. It needs innovative reform of the healthcare system. Effective healthcare reform must put the consumer in control of his healthcare dollar with incentives for rewards if consumers use their healthcare dollar wisely. Government and the healthcare insurance industry’s control of the healthcare dollar has not worked. Government control does not work because the government can not manage effectively and outsources control to the healthcare insurance industry.

I do not agree with Senator Obama’s plan because it is going to head us down the road of government as a single party payer with healthcare insurance company management like the Massachusetts plan.

Neither candidate has a viable plan. The WSJ editorial does not focus on the issue of healthcare reform. It confuses us about a sidebar tactic.

“ But wait, let’s consult another one of Mr. Obama’s advisers. David Cutler, the Otto Eckstein Professor of Applied Economics at Harvard, put it this way: “Health insurance is not something that is made better by tying it to employment. As a result, essentially all economists believe that universal coverage should be done outside of employment.”

That passage comes from Mr. Cutler’s 2004 book, “Your Money or Your Life,” which outlined a strategy for universal health care. Not surprisingly, Professor Cutler’s plan, like Mr. McCain’s, also applied subsidies such as “tax credits — people get a lower tax bill, or a refund from the government, to be used to purchase insurance.” In this he was echoing many other liberal health experts such as MIT’s Jonathan Gruber, another Democratic policy star.

I think the WSJ thinks Americans are stupid. If they throw enough unrelated quotes at us we will be totally confused.

I believe as Colin Powell believes. Barack Obama is potentially a transformational figure. He seems to have a deeper view of issues than most. Hopefully, he is smart enough to see through the folly in his healthcare advisors’ plans. John McCain is not transforming anything.

  • Alan Shimel

    Stan – I agree with you. The WSJ is just not what it used to be. But than again neither is Wall Street itself. Do you think Murdoch owning it has anything to do with it? Will the WSJ become the print version of Fox News “fair and balanced”? I hope not. What a shame to see another American institution watered down.

  • Thanks for leaving a comment, please keep it clean. HTML allowed is strong, code and a href.

Permalink:

War On Obesity: Obesity And The Economy: Part 10

Stanley Feld M.D.,FACP,MACE

Our financial crisis can be an instrument of change in a positive direction. America’s obesity epidemic is a weapon of mass destruction destined to cause another financial crisis. An increase in the complications of chronic disease can cause an economic meltdown if the obesity epidemic is not contained. The complications of chronic diseases result in the expenditure of 90% our healthcare dollars.

The average American burns 1200 to 2000 calories per day with normal activities of daily living. 2.2 lbs. of fat store 9000 calories of energy. In order to gain 2.2 lbs. a person needs to eat 9000 calories more than he burns. In order to lose 2.2 lbs a person needs to burn 9000 calories more than he eats.

It is very easy to gain 9,000 calories and very hard to lose 9,000 calories in America’s cultural environment. The average fast food meal is over 1000 calories while thirty minutes of jogging at an eleven minute mile burns 200 calories.

How can our financial crisis impact our obesity epidemic? Americans are being cautious about spending money. Large amounts of their retirement savings  are being wiped out.

Exercise is cheap. Couples sharing meals at restaurants result in half the caloric intake and half the cost.

Restaurant entrees are at least 1200 calories. TGI Friday’s tried to develop a competitive advantage by offering smaller portion entrees at lower prices. The plan has not gotten any traction. 

America has to be conditioned to a cultural change in eating habits. We have experienced the explosive change in eating habits in the 1950s and 1960s with the introduction of fast food vendors and snack foods. This was the result of Pavlovian conditioning. 

However, a person can feel just as satisfied with half a sandwich as a whole sandwich. In hard economic times sharing a meal cost half as much as two meals. If we eat simple meals at home it can cost much less than buying take out meals or eating in a restaurant.

How can we accomplish this cultural change? I believe it can be done through education and subliminal advertising. Everyone wants to be thin. They do not have the information to accomplish their goal.

Wal-Mart is going to have a nutritional consultant on its web site suggesting inexpensive healthy food planning. 

New York City’s Mayor Michael Bloomberg is a genius. We need more leaders like him. The New York City Department of health has initiated an educational campaign on the NYC Subway.

“The five ads appearing in subway cars are designed to help people see how quickly fast-food calories add up and drive home the message that some foods can have deceptively high calorie counts.”

The best is a poster of a delicious looking apple raisin muffin. The ad states the muffin is 475 calories. Above the muffin it say the average person burns 2000 calories per day. The observer was left to fill in the rest and make his own choice.

clip_image001

“If you’re eating it as a snack, you may want to split it with a friend,” Nonas, a registered dietitian, said in a statement.

 

The New York City Department of Health has four additional advertisements. The ads are educational and subliminal.

clip_image002

clip_image003

This is a brilliant public service campaign. However, it only tells half the story. In order to lose weight you have to eat less and burn more. NYC has to follow up with exercise posters and a sustained campaign. Any campaign has to be sustained and remain exciting in order to cause the cultural change in eating necessary to stop the growth of obesity.

The federal government should be doing a similar public service campaign all over the United States. The media is the message and this message should constantly be a reminder to all of us. If we are serious about Repairing The Healthcare System we have to be serious about my War On Obesity.

  • Jason Smith of Obesity Terminator

    Great site!
    Ever wonder why you start panting after climbing even only 10 steps of the stairs? Tired of looking for the right size of clothing to fit your body? Or worse, do you always get people to notice you, yet at the same time discriminate you?
    Terrible as they may seem, but these are just some of the countless bad effects of obesity.
    It’s true…
    Take it from me because I have been there. And it wasn’t fun – even just bringing it back to mind can be so frustrating.
    But I didn’t lose hope. I made an extra effort to study what causes obesity and how it can be treated. Thus, I alloted enough time to perform what I have learned.
    And now, I have achieved the perfect body weight and figure I have always wanted.
    Like me, I’m sure you can do it.

  • Thanks for leaving a comment, please keep it clean. HTML allowed is strong, code and a href.

Permalink:

Perverse Outcomes Resulting From a Distorted Healthcare System.

 

Stanley Feld M.D.,FACP,MACE

A great comment was sent to me by an Emergency Physician in reference to the increased Emergency Room visits despite the increase in insured people in the state of Massachusetts. He referred me to his blog.

Unfortunately the destined to fail Romney healthcare plan of Massachusetts is being hailed as a breakthrough by healthcare policy wonks all 50 states. They do not understand the healthcare system.

I am very happy that physicians are starting to use the blogosphere to explain the defects in the healthcare system. Politicians and citizens should listen. It is going to take a citizens’ movement to change the frightful direction of the healthcare system.

In the 1970’s,my father drove my brother and me (both Texans by then) through destroyed neighborhoods in New York City. He wanted to show us the degradation of once viable neighborhoods.

I will never forget him telling us politicians cannot see any of this from 30,000 feet above the ground. The reason health policy wonks and politicians do not see the destruction of the healthcare system is because no one is looking at it at street level. The street level physicians could tell politicians what is going on but none of the politicians are asking or listening. The blogosphere has given physicians a voice. I am happy physicians are taking the time to tell people what is going on. Hopefully someone will listen soon.

Charity Doc is an emergency room physician who describes himself as follows;

“ I once had aspirations to make a difference in the world, now I just work at it one guaiac card at a time. The lucky ones come back negative. Blue’s a bad color!”

He states:

“In honesty though, we’re not all heartless, money-grubbing bastards. We’re here to help everyone who truly needs our expertise.”

I believe him because physicians at all levels are feeling as dispirited as Charity Doc.

 

“Our current health care system here in America cannot continue on its current course for long for all of the reasons above. “

Charity Doc gives multiple examples and abuse of the emergency room system.

“ I fear a slippery slide to socialized health care if we don’t quickly overhaul the system. When ~20% of the GDP (30% depending on which studies you read) of this country is projected to go toward health care expenditures by the end of this decade, our inefficient system cannot be sustained. The breakpoint is about to come. We are headed toward a huge national crisis and our politicians do not seem to care. In fact, we are already in a crisis and it’s about to get worse.”
“The problems that I bitched and moaned about above are not unique to my hospital alone. It is happening at every Emergency Dept. in this country. More and more Americans are uninsured these days. The numbers are expected to continue to rise. And where do they go for their health care? They show up to the ER’s across the country, of course, bogging down the system causing a serious overcrowding.”

Emergency Room abuse is only a fraction of the problem. If patients do not own their healthcare dollar they do not care how they spend healthcare monies. If they do not have insurance or money they know they will be taken care of nonetheless.

“Thus, uninsured patients show up in hoards to the ERs because we don’t and cannot make them pay first to be seen. The Federal EMTALA law (Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act) requires that every patient who shows up to a hospital ER must receive a medical screening and stabilization if that hospital participates in Medicare. Without Medicare funding, a hospital is certain to go belly up bankrupt and thus EMTALA is pretty much inclusive of all hospitals in the US of A.”

Private clinics, however, are not bound by EMTALA to do the same.

“So in a way, we already have, sort of, universal health care here in the USA. The word is long out. If you have no health insurance and can’t pay for health care, go to the nearest ER. You don’t have to pay up front and we are too scared of law suits not to take care of you. You can make up phony information about yourself, fake who you are, give ’em aliases, fake phone numbers and addresses, phony social security numbers and you’ll never have to see that hospital bill.”

It is inconvienent care but free care none the less.

“ EMTALA is a well-intentioned law meant to prevent patient dumping and abandonment. Too many people, however, take advantage of it and abuse the system.”

How do the hospital systems make a up for the loss? The government and healthcare insurance companies pay the hospital losses through cost shifting and non transparent accounting.

Charity Doc’s blog is  worth reading if you really want to know what is going on at the street level. The silly things our Presidential candidates are saying are not going to solve these problems. The Republican administration methodical destruction of our safety net charity hospital system is going to make things worse.

America! Please wake up.

The opinions expressed in the blog “Repairing The Healthcare System” are, mine and mine alone.

  • Thanks for leaving a comment, please keep it clean. HTML allowed is strong, code and a href.