Stanley Feld M.D., FACP, MACE Menu

Results found: 266

Permalink:

Pharmaceutical Companies Shafting Healthcare Insurance Companies

Stanley Feld M.D.,FACP,MACE

 

The pharmaceutical companies are marketing kings. The large increase in generic sales has affected their bottom line. When they are up against the wall marketing gets innovative.

EXECUTIVES of a small insurance company in Albany were mystified when, almost overnight, its payments for a certain class of antibiotics nearly doubled, threatening to add about a half-million dollars annually in costs.”

The drug benefits costs for this healthcare insurance company increased as it did for others because the drug company was innovative. It started giving out coupons to cover the patients’ co-pay. It did not cost the patient to pay for this new expensive medication. It cost the insurance company dearly because patients stopped using the generics since their co-pay was covered by the drug company. The effectiveness difference between the generic and the new antibiotic was questionable.

This is not the first time drug companies have given patients co-payment coupons. The coupons paid the branded drugs’ co-pay. This is another example of consumer driven power. Consumers will seek the best price and highest quality.

The use of such co-payment cards and coupons and other types of discounts has more than tripled since mid-2006, according to IMS Health, an information company that tracks the pharmaceutical industry.

Consumers are smart. They know when they are getting a good deal. Pfizer, the maker of Lipitor, introduced a new coupon card that reduces the co-pay for Lipitor to $4 a month. The co-pay for Lipitor is about $50 for a month’s supply. The coupon card saves consumers as much as $50 a month. The coupon gives Pfizer a chance to have Lipitor compete with generic Zocor at Wal-Mart and other chains.

The healthcare insurance industry pays much more for Lipitor than it does for generic Zocor. The clinical evidence for a difference in the medications is small. The marketing of the clinical evidence is a gimmick. The both work the same. Lipitor is twice as potent therefore, you need half the dose to achieve the same effect.

Drug companies say the coupon plans help some patients afford medicines that they otherwise could not. “

The health insurance companies say the coupons are a marketing gimmick. In reality they are. The healthcare insurance industry is just going to pass the cost to its bottom line to consumers by raising the price of insurance premiums.

The member is somewhat insulated from the cost of the prescription,” said Kevin Slavik, senior director of pharmacy at the Health Care Service Corporation, which runs Blue Cross and Blue Shield plans in Illinois and three other states. “In essence, it drives up the total cost of providing the prescription benefit.”

President Obama, where are you when the public needs you? The Food and Drug Administration has been ineffective.

The Food and Drug Administration, meanwhile, is studying the effect of the discounts on consumer perceptions, concerned that the coupons will make consumers believe that a drug is safer or better than it really is.”

The differences in costs are astounding.

  1. Once a day Minocycline is $700 per month. The price of a twice a day generic Minocycline $40 per month
  2. In New York City in a union representing public employees, 59 percent of claims were brand-name statins whose co-pay was coupon supported. The claims cost the union $17.3 million. The other 41 percent of claims were for generic statins. It cost the union only $179,000. The union has eliminated the co-pay on generic statins to encourage their use.
  3. Jazz Pharmaceuticals has quadrupled the price of its narcolepsy drug Xyrem, to about $30,000 a year, over the last five years. In order to cushion patients’ out of pocket cost, the company recently increased its co-pay assistance to as much as $1,200 a month.

“It seems the best strategy for a pharmaceutical company is to price their drug as high as they possibly can and offer that co-pay assistance broadly” to insulate consumers, said Joshua Schimmer,

Co-payment coupons are distributed by drug company sales representatives to physicians. Physicians are made to believe they are helping their patients. The coupons are also available directly to patients over the Internet. Patients present them at the drugstore when paying for their prescriptions and receive the discount.

Medicis, the company that sells Solodyn(Minocycline extended tablet), have told investors that the co-payment card is used by an “overwhelming majority” of patients, and is largely responsible for doubling use of the drug, to 26,000 prescriptions a week.

The use of once a day Minocycline vs. twice a day generic Minocycline results in a difference in cost of $2.6 billion dollars a year for this one drug.

There is something wrong. Physicians are not aware of the drug companies’ gimmicks. They think they are helping their patients. The pharmaceutical industry is indeed the king of marketing.

Pharmaceutical Companies Shafting Healthcare Insurance Companies. Healthcare Insurance Companies in turn will shaft patients by increasing their premiums.

President Obama’s healthcare reform act should be doing something about this if it wants to keep the cost of healthcare down. It is not doing anything about this problem.

The opinions expressed in the blog “Repairing The Healthcare System” are, mine and mine alone.

Permalink:

Healthcare Insurance Companies Shafting Patients

Stanley Feld M.D.,FACP, MACE

Prescription drug consumption can demonstrate the power of the consumer. This can demonstrate the power of a consumer driven healthcare system. Since 2006 the use of generic drugs to reduce the cost of healthcare for patients and the healthcare insurance industry has escalated.

Consumers have demanded that physicians use generic drugs when possible. Insurance drug plans promote the demand for generic drugs by having higher patient deductibles for branded drugs as well as not covering some branded drugs. Some insurance drug plans have eliminated the patient deductible for patients using generic drugs.

Physicians are being forced by their patients to become more aware of the cost of medications. Patients (consumers) are demanding generic substitution. In the past pharmaceutical companies seduced physicians into trying their new drugs. They sold the new drug as better than the first generation drug. In some cases it was. In most cases the difference was marginal.

Pharmaceutical companies also started to manufacture many me too drugs as well as combinations of two older drugs in order to extend expiration of the drug patent. This prevented generic drug manufacturers from manufacturing blockbuster drugs at lower generic prices.

The marketing implications were that the new medications were “better” than the old medication. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved many of the combination drugs.

As physicians became aware of the cost difference between branded and generic drugs they became irritated. They have switched patients to generics.

Brand name drug patents usually last 14 years from the initial studies for FDA approval. Generic medication manufacturing undergoes the same rigorous FDA quality control study as do brand name drugs.

Both the healthcare insurance industry and Medicare/Medicaid programs have drug benefit programs. Medicare and Medicaid drug benefits are outsourced to the healthcare insurance industry by the federal government. The healthcare industry buys drugs from a Pharmaceutical Benefit Organization (PBO). Many times a healthcare insurance company owns the PBO. The payment system is very complicated. There is no way of telling what the real wholesale price of a drug is. There are many conflicts of interests involved.

There are multiple wholesale prices for a drug. Every time the drug goes through another middleman overhead and profit are also built into the drug price. In fact, the healthcare industry earns 4.7 billion dollars from the federal government per year from Medicare Part D.

There is nothing transparent about the profits made by the secondary stakeholders.

Wal-Mart almost broke the healthcare insurance industry’s cash cow by selling many generic drugs for $4 per month. Wal-Mart has recently instituted a 3 month supply cost of the drug for $10. Interestingly enough the large pharmacies, the healthcare insurance industry and the PBOs have figured out how to rip off the consumers despite Wal-Mart’s initiative.

If patients use their drug benefit insurance policy for a generic prescription, they will be charged $4 or more. The total charge toward their Medicare donut might be $30. The price the pharmacy plan (Medicare Part D) supposedly paid for a one month prescription. If seniors pay Wal-Mart cash and do not use their drug benefit plan, the total cost of the transaction to seniors is $4 as opposed to the $30 charged to their donut.

Most seniors have not figured this out. They use Medicare Part D to pay for their medications. Seniors should buy their generic medications for cash. They should not charge it to their Medicare Part D drug benefit. Since the healthcare care insurance industry probably gets the generic from the pharmacy for $4, the healthcare insurance company’s out of pocket expense for the medication is zero. Seniors have paid for the drug with their deductible. If seniors hit their donut, they will have to pay retail to the pharmacy for additional medications.

President Obama’s healthcare reform act modified the donut insignificantly. Yet he is selling the $250 increase toward the donut as a great advance.

Why is it so complicated? We are dealing with lobbies from at least three industries. None of these lobbyists represents patients or physicians.

Does President Obama’s healthcare reform act do anything to solve the cost of medications seniors need to maintain health? No.

President Obama’s healthcare reform act has done very little and very ineffectively to fix the drug benefit problem. He has not protected seniors or others from the abuses of the healthcare insurance industry.

The opinions expressed in the blog “Repairing The Healthcare System” are, mine and mine alone.

Permalink:

Common-Sense Repair To The Healthcare System

 

Stanley Feld M.D.,FACP,MACE

As the practice of medicine becomes increasingly technology based, bureaucratized, politicized, and commoditized, we move further away from the real issues facing our healthcare system.

The real issues that must be faced to repair the healthcare system are being ignored with President Obama’s healthcare reform act. The real issues are the maintenance of the physician- patient relationship, institution of real malpractice reform, and increasing patients’ responsibility for their health and their healthcare dollars. The development of systems of care must be incentivized to decrease the incidence of complications of chronic diseases.

There must be significant changes made to the accounting rules used by the healthcare insurance industry.

Patients own their diseases. They should be responsible for maintaining their health and managing their disease. It should not be the job of employers, government, or the healthcare insurance companies. The healthcare system must be consumer driven. It should not be driven by the government or insurance companies.

President Obama’s goal is to have complete government control of the healthcare system. He is trying to control the healthcare system using untested bureaucratic methods. The process will result in increasing the cost of healthcare, decreasing access to medical care and rationing care.

President Obama has not communicated effectively how the healthcare insurance industry is ripping off Medicare/Medicaid, the private insurance industry and taxpayers.

I was in a meeting with a group of primary care physicians and human resources officers from large self-insured corporations. The discussion was focused on the human resources officer increasing healthcare costs.

They did not understand how the healthcare insurance companies were ripping off their self-insured plans. All the human resource officers outsource their administrative services to the healthcare industry. They believe the healthcare insurance company was making only 3% profit while providing the administrative services to their company.

The human resource officers agreed that physicians were receiving 10% of their company’s healthcare expenditures. They all thought the hospital systems were getting 50% of their self-insured healthcare dollars.

I asked who was receiving the other 40% of the healthcare dollar.

Someone said we were getting into the weeds now. He was correct. The devil is in the details. As a society, we are focused on the sound bites and have no patience for detail.

The healthcare insurance industry has taken advantage of that fact.

 

Below is a consolidated statement of income for WellPoint. UnitedHealth and Aethna consolidated statements are similar.

 

WellPoint, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Income

(In millions, except per share data)

Years ended December 31

2008

2007

2006

Revenues

Premiums

$

57,101.0

$

55,865.0

$

51,971.9

Administrative fees

3,836.6

3,673.6

3,594.8

Other revenue

641.6

< /em>

617.0

613.1

Total operating revenue

61,579.2

60,155.6

56,179.8

Net investment income

851.1

1,001.1

878.7

Net realized (losses) gains on investments

(1,179.2

)

11.2

(0.3

)

Total revenues

61,251.1

61,167.9

57,058.2

Expenses

Benefit expense

47,742.4

46,037.2

42,192.0

Selling, general and administrative expense:

Selling expense

1,778.4

1,716.8

1,654.5

General and administrative expense

7,242.1

6,984.7

7,163.2

Total selling, general and administrative expense

9,020.5

8,701.5

8,817.7

Cost of drugs

468.5

432.7

433.2

Interest expense

469.8

447.9

403.5

Amortization of other intangible assets

286.1

290.7

297.4

Impairment of intangible assets

141.4

—  

—  

Total expenses

58,128.7

55,910.0

52,143.8


Income before income tax expense

3,122.4

5,257.9

4,914.4

Income tax expense

631.7

1,912.5

1,819.5

Net income

$

2,490.7

$

3,345.4

$

3,094.9

Net income per share

Basic

$

4.79

$

5.64

$

4.93

Diluted

$

4.76

$

5.56

$

4.82

Revenue from premiums are 57,101,000,000 billion dollars. WellPoint claims benefit expenses were 47,742,400,000 billion dollars. Therefore, WellPoint paid 83.6% of its premium revenue for medical care benefits.

 This financial statement satisfies President Obama’s new regulations that demand the healthcare insurance industry pay 80-85% in medical care benefits. It satisfies the new medical loss ratio. Medical loss ratio is defined as incurred claims divided by earned premiums.

The question is what is included in benefit expenses. Are benefit expenses only payments for medical care? This place where we get into the weeds and meet the devil.

The human resource officers of major corporations felt physicians received 10% of the healthcare dollars and hospitals receive 50% of the healthcare dollars. WellPoint financial statement claim 83.6% each healthcare dollar are paid for medical care benefits.

Where is the remaining 23.6% in medical care benefit expenses? Many in congress believe the healthcare insurance industry receives 40% of the healthcare dollar.

The number is correct. 23.6% plus (100%-83.6%) 16.4% equals 40%.

I will explain where the missing 23.6% of benefit expenses go, shortly.

President Obama might be pulling another trick play on the taxpayer. Either that or the healthcare insurance industry is using a trick play on him. In either case the taxpayer loses.

The opinions expressed in the blog “Repairing The Healthcare System” are, mine and mine alone.

Permalink:

Nontransparent Healthcare Reform Act Waivers

clip_image001

 

Stanley Feld M.D.,FACP,MACE

The health care system is broken. President Obama’s healthcare bill should be repealed. Congress should start over again using common sense. The healthcare system is a complete nightmare for all stakeholders. It consists of a series of patches to fix a dysfunctional healthcare system. President Obama’s healthcare reform act is creating a bigger nightmare.

President Obama should construct a consumer driven healthcare system with federal and state government oversight rather than a federal government driven system.

President Obama’s healthcare reform act transfers congressional control of the federal healthcare system to the executive branch of government. Nonelected officials can make rules without congressional oversight.

Checks and balances are lost. The loss of checks and balances is dangerous. Political decisions can be made by the executive branch of government without congressional input.

The McDonalds’ healthcare insurance waiver became a political embarrassment to President Obama. The healthcare insurance waiver occurred just before the midterm elections. It was clear President Obama did not want to increase the number of uninsured before the midterm election.

McDonalds said it could not afford to insure its employees under the new healthcare reform act’s regulations. The administration created a new rule to provide McDonalds and 32 other companies with a waiver from healthcare regulations that would go into effect January 1,2011.

The government’s press release about the waivers created a big stir in the blogging world. It also caused a reaction in the traditional media. The President gave in to influence by lobbying groups. Cries of favoritism resulted.

At the beginning of November the government issued 111 waivers without informing the press.

The waiver was interpreted as an admission of just how job-killing and business-crushing the new health care law really is. These new waivers were buried in the Department of Health and Human Services web site without publicity.

Below is a list of companies granted waivers so far.

 

Applicant

Application
Received

Plan
Effective
Date

Number
of
Enrollees

Application
Completed by
Applicant

Waiver
Approved

1

Protocol Marketing Group

10/4/2010

1/1/2011

454

10/25/2010

11/1/2010

2

Sasnak

9/29/2010

1/1/2011

813

9/29/2010

11/1/2010

3

Star Tek

10/1/2010

1/1/2011

1,423

10/26/2010

11/1/2010

4

Adventist Care Centers

10/1/2010

1/1/2011

725

10/26/2010

10/29/2010

5

B.E.S.T of NY

10/7/2010

1/1/2011

1,200

10/27/2010

10/29/2010

6

Boskovich Farms, Inc

10/8/2010

1/1/2011

165

10/28/2010

10/29/2010

7

Gallegos Corp

9/29/2010

1/1/2011

86

10/28/2010

10/29/2010

8

Jeffords Steel and Engineering

10/4/2010

1/1/2011

112

10/28/2010

10/29/2010

9

O.K. Industries

10/4/2010

1/1/2011

1,238

10/28/2010

10/29/2010

10

Service Employees Benefit Fund

10/12/2010

11/1/2010

1,297

10/29/2010

10/29/2010

11

Sun Pacific Farming Coop

10/6/2010

12/1/2010

1,109

10/6/2010

10/29/2010

12

UFCW Allied Trade Health & Welfare Trust

10/5/2010

1-Dec

68

10/25/2010

10/29/2010

13

HCR Manor Care

10/5/2010

1/1/2011

2,666

10/26/2010

10/28/2010

14

IBEW No.915

9/28/2010

1/1/2011

930

10/15/2010

10/28/2010

15

Integra BMS for Culp, Inc.

10/4/2010

1/1/2011

34

10/25/2010

10/28/2010

16

New England Health Care Employees Welfare Fund

9/27/2010

1/1/2011

7,454

10/26/2010

10/28/2010

17

Aegis Security Insurance Company

10/6/2010

11/1/2010

67

10/25/2010

10/26/2010

18

Alliance One Tobacco

9/30/2010

1/1/2011

138

10/21/2010

10/26/2010

19

Asbestos Workers Local 53 Welfare Fund

9/29/2010

1/1/2011

2

10/21/2010

10/26/2010

20

Assurant Health (2nd Application)

9/29/2010

1/1/2011

19,024

10/21/2010

10/26/2010

21

Captain Elliot’s Party Boats

10/12/2010

11/1/2010

10

10/25/2010

10/26/2010

22

Carlson Restaurants

9/22/2010

1/1/2011

3,381

10/21/2010

10/26/2010

23

CH Guenther & Son

9/24/2010

1/1/2011

300

10/21/2010

10/26/2010

24

CKM Industries dba Miller Environmental

10/5/2010

11/1/2010

34

10/25/2010

10/26/2010

25

Caribbean Workers’ Voluntary Employees’ Health and Welfare Plan

10/14/2010

10/1/2010

4,500

10/18/2010

10/26/2010

26

Darden Restaurants

9/30/2010

1/1/2011

34,000

10/21/2010

10/26/2010

27

Duarte Nursery

9/23/2010

1/1/2011

283

10/19/2010

10/26/2010

28

Employees Security Fund

9/29/2010

1/1/2011

22

9/29/2010

10/26/2010

29

Florida Trowel Trades

9/27/2010

1/1/2011

297

10/21/2010

10/26/2010

30

Ingles Markets

9/30/2010

1/1/2011

917

10/25/2010

10/26/2010

31

Meijer

10/1/2010

1/1/2011

4,873

10/1/2010

10/26/2010

32

O’Reilly Auto Parts

9/23/2010

1/1/2011

9,722

9/23/2010

10/26/2010

33

Plumbers & Pipefitters Local 123 Welfare Fund

9/30/2010

1/1/2011

534

10/21/2010

10/26/2010

34

Sun Belt

9/28/2010

10/1/2010

114

10/20/2010

10/26/2010

35

UFCW Local 227

10/12/2010

11/1/2010

1,125

10/12/2010

10/26/2010

36

Uncle Julio’s

9/30/2010

11/1/2010

115

10/25/2010

10/26/2010

37

United Group

9/24/2010

1/1/2011

177

10/19/2010

10/26/2010

38

US Imaging

10/11/2010

11/1/2010

148

10/25/2010

10/26/2010

39

Vino Farms

10/8/2010

11/1/2010

152

10/21/2010

10/26/2010

40

Advanta Staff, Inc.

9/20/2010

9/1/2011

52

9/20/2010

10/21/2010

41

Agricare

9/23/2010

11/1/2010

437

9/23/2010

10/21/2010

42

Alaska Seafood

9/23/2010

1/1/2010

262

10/15/2010

10/21/2010

43

American Fidelity

9/22/2010

10/23/2010

9,358

10/14/2010

10/21/2010

44

Convergys

9/20/2010

1/1/2011

1,400

9/20/2010

10/21/2010

45

Darensberries

9/28/2010

10/1/2010

1,450

9/28/2010

10/21/2010

46

Gowan Company

9/23/2010

1/1/2011

225

9/27/2010

10/21/2010

47

Greystar

9/23/2010

1/1/2011

1,747

10/13/2010

10/21/2010

48

Macayo Restaurants

9/22/2010

12/1/2010

46

10/18/2010

10/21/2010

49

Periodical Services

9/27/2010

1/1/2011

464

9/27/2010

10/21/2010

50

UniFirst

9/23/2010

9/1/2011

2,659

10/14/2010

10/21/2010

51

Universal Forest Products

9/23/2011

5/1/2010

1,738

10/19/2010

10/21/2010

52

UFCW Maximus Local 455

10/4/2010

1/1/2011

59

10/18/2010

10/18/2010

53

American Habilitation Services, Inc.

9/22/2010

1/1/2011

400

10/12/2010

10/14/2010

54

GuideStone Financial Resources

9/21/2010

1/1/2011

354

9/21/2010

10/14/2010

55

Local 25 SEIU

9/29/2010

10/1/2010

31,000

10/7/2010

10/14/2010

56

MAUSER Corp.

9/21/2010

1/1/2011

47

9/24/2010

10/14/2010

57

Preferred Care, Inc.

9/15/2010

1/1/2011

918

9/15/2010

10/14/2010

58

Ruby Tuesday

10/8/2010

1/1/2011

3,219

10/8/2010

10/14/2010

59

The Dixie Group, Inc.

8/27/2010

6/19/2010

269

10/12/2010

10/14/2010

60

UFCW Local 1262

9/20/2010

10/1/2010

5,390

9/20/2010

10/14/2010

61

Whelan Security Company

9/23/2010

1/1/2011

287

10/12/2010

10/14/2010

62

AMF Bowling Worldwide

9/14/2010

1/1/2011

295

10/7/2010

10/12/2010

63

Assisted Living Concepts

9/17/2010

1/1/2011

1,174

9/17/2010

10/12/2010

64

Case & Associates

9/17/2010

1/1/2011

87

9/17/2010

10/12/2010

65

GPM Investments

9/17/2010

1/1/2011

275

9/17/2010

10/12/2010

66

Grace Living Centers

9/14/2010

10/1/2010

534

9/14/2010

10/12/2010

67

Mountaire Corporation

9/17/2010

1/1/2011

2,074

9/17/2010

10/12/2010

68

Swift Spinning

9/16/2010

1/1/2011

240

9/16/2010

10/12/2010

69

Belmont Village

9/10/2010

1/1/2011

785

10/4/2010

10/8/2010

70

Caliber Services

9/13/2010

1/1/2011

606

9/13/2010

10/8/2010

71

Cracker Barrel

9/9/2010

1/1/2011

16,823

9/17/2010

10/8/2010

72

DISH Network

9/13/2010

3/1/2011

3,597

9/23/2010

10/8/2010

73

Groendyke Transport,  Inc

9/2/2010

1/1/2011

1,322

9/2/2010

10/8/2010

74

Pocono Medical Center

9/24/2010

1/1/2011

3,298

9/24/2010

10/8/2010

75

Regis Corporation

9/10/2010

3/1/2011

3,617

10/1/2010

10/8/2010

76

The Pictsweet Co.

9/13/2010

1/1/2010

694

9/13/2010

10/8/2010

77

Diversified Interiors

9/28/2010

10/1/2010

300

9/28/2010

10/1/2010

78

Local 802 Musicians Health Fund

9/29/2010

10/1/2010

1,801

9/29/2010

10/1/2010

79

MCS Life Insurance Company

9/20/2010

10/1/2010

6,635

9/23/2010

10/1/2010

80

The Buccaneer

9/22/2010

10/1/2010

125

9/28/2010

10/1/2010

81

CIGNA

9/17/2010

9/26/2010

265,000

9/30/2010

9/30/2010

82

Greater Metropolitan Hotel

9/16/2010

10/1/2010

1,200

9/24/2010

9/30/2010

83

Local 17 Hospitality Benefit Fund

9/16/2010

10/1/2010

881

9/24/2010

9/30/2010

84

GS-ILA

9/15/2010

10/1/2010

298

9/15/2010

9/28/2010

85

Allied

9/13/2010

10/1/2010

127

9/13/2010

9/27/2010

86

Harden Healthcare

9/9/2010

1/1/2011

874

9/29/2010

9/27/2010

87

Health and Welfare Benefit System

9/16/2010

10/1/2010

41

9/16/2010

9/27/2010

88

Health Connector

9/20/2010

10/1/2010

3,544

9/24/2010

9/27/2010

89

I.U.P.A.T

9/16/2010

10/1/2010

875

9/23/2010

9/27/2010

90

Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.

9/22/2010

10/1/2010

326

9/22/2010

9/27/2010

91

Transport Workers

9/20/2010

10/1/2010

107

9/23/2010

9/27/2010

92

UFT Welfare Fund

9/16/2010

10/1/2010

351,000

9/27/2010

9/27/2010

93

Aegis

9/16/2010

10/1/2010

162

9/21/2010

9/24/2010

94

Aetna

9/16/2010

10/1/2010

209,423

9/16/2010

9/24/2010

95

Allflex

9/20/2010

10/1/2010

34

9/22/2010

9/24/2010

96

Baptist Retirement

9/10/2010

10/1/2010

127

9/17/2010

9/24/2010

97

BCS Insurance

9/13/2010

9/24/2010

115,000

9/22/2010

9/24/2010

98

Cryogenic

9/20/2010

10/1/2010

19

9/20/2010

9/24/2010

99

Fowler Packing Co.

9/8/2010

10/1/2010

39

9/17/2010

9/24/2010

100

Guy C. Lee Mfg.

9/15/2010

10/1/2010

312

9/15/2010

9/24/2010

101

HealthPort

9/17/2010

10/1/2010

608

9/17/2010

9/24/2010

102

Jack in the Box

9/17/2010

10/1/2010

1,130

9/21/2010

9/24/2010

103

Maritime Association

9/17/2010

10/1/2010

500

9/21/2010

9/24/2010

104

Maverick County

9/21/2010

10/1/2010

1

9/23/2010

9/24/2010

105

Metro Paving Fund

9/20/2010

10/1/2010

550

9/20/2010

9/24/2010

106

PMPS-ILA

9/19/2010

10/1/2010

15

9/23/2010

9/24/2010

107

PS-ILA

9/19/2010

10/1/2010

8

9/23/2010

9/24/2010

108

QK/DRD (Denny’s)

9/16/2010

10/1/2010

65

9/22/2010

9/24/2010

109

Reliance Standard

9/14/2010

10/1/2010

varies

9/14/2010

9/24/2010

110

Tri-Pak

9/20/2010

10/1/2010

26

9/20/2010

9/24/2010

111

UABT

9/17/2010

10/1/2010

17,347

9/17/2010

9/24/2010

 

total

   

1,175,411

   

What does it say about an the administration’s healthcare reform act when it grants so many exemptions from a law? Didn’t President Obama tell us this healthcare reform act would be ultimate solution to our health care problems?

Shouldn’t the waivers be automatically to companies and unions without application?

Wouldn’t companies that are granted the waiver have a competitive advantage over other companies in the same industry that do not have an exemption?

Last week the Department of Health & Human Services published a set of new guidelines for those seeking to apply for a waiver.  As news of these waivers starts to spread the Department of Health & Human Services will swamped with applications for waivers.

The Office of Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight’s sub-regulatory guidance on the process for obtaining waivers of the annual limits requirements may be found at: http://www.hhs.gov/ociio/regulations/patient/ociio_2010-1_20100903_508.pdf

The administration says it is responding to concerns of employers and others. Many workers would not have a healthcare insurance alternative.

President Obama’s healthcare reform act is causing more problems than it is solving.

Just think about the administrative bureaucracy, costs and inefficiency generated by this unintended consequence.

Other unintended consequences will be generated by President Obama’s healthcare reform act.

President Obama needs to start all over again and develop a consumer driven healthcare system that aligns all the stakeholders’ incentives.

The opinions expressed in the blog “Repairing The Healthcare System” are, mine and mine alone.

 
   
   

 

Permalink:

President Obama’s Healthcare Reform Will Fail. What Should We Be Doing Next?

Stanley Feld M.D.,FACP,MACE

Dr. Don Berwick, Director of CMS, has stated that the Healthcare System is too complex for people to manage their own medical care. It must be left up to the experts in government. I believe 160 new government agencies will not succeed in managing individuals’ medical care very efficiently. The resulting system will be less efficient. It will also limit access to care.

The Massachusetts Healthcare Reform experiment has failed for reasons I have outlined previously.

President Obama’s Healthcare Reform Plan will also fail at a very high cost to the American taxpayer. His healthcare reform law follows the basic principles of the Massachusetts Healthcare Reform Plan.

Some readers misunderstand the two models I have proposed to Repair the Healthcare System. Those models are Consumer Driven Healthcare and the Ideal Medical Saving Accounts.

Regina Herzlinger the Nancy R. McPherson Professor of Business Administration Chair at Harvard Business School has been called the “godmother” of Consumer Driven Healthcare.

For those readers who skim blogs, I think it would be a excellent exercise for the reader to settle down and watch an entertaining “You Tube” by Dr. Regina Herzlinger describing the power of Consumer Driven Healthcare.

McKinsey consultants have claimed that administrative inefficiency of the healthcare system accounts for $500 billion dollars of excess cost per year to the healthcare system. I think it is closer to $250 billion dollars a year.

Eliminating inefficiency will not be achieved by adding 160 new bureaucratic agencies and over 800 new regulations.

The solution to the problem is easy. The social contract for medical care should be between patients and physicians. Consumers should owned their healthcare dollars. They should be given incentives to be responsible for their medical care and maintaining their health. Chronic disease complication rates would fall, obesity would be decrease and the cost of healthcare would decrease.

The role of government should be to empower consumers to control their medical expenditures and maintain their health. The government should level the playing field between stakeholders. It should provide education and subsidies to those who need it. The government should teach them how to control their healthcare dollars and maintain their health. Then government should get out of the way.

The opinions expressed in the blog “Repairing The Healthcare System” are, mine and mine alone.

Permalink:

Healthcare Reform Should Be About Motivating Self-Responsibility Not Dependence

Stanley Feld M.D,FACP,MACE

Last week I heard a lecture about Accountable Care Organizations by a physician leader working for one of the major hospital systems.

His discussion made me realize that large physician organizations and hospitals are spending lots of time solving problems of quality medical care. In my opinion quality medical care has not been adequately defined.

A working definition right now is to decrease hospital stays, efficient medical care for a disease at lower cost, avoidance of medical errors in the hospital, and avoidance of hospital acquired infections.

These are important goals. They must be attached to monetary incentives. Many of these problems can be solved now. The solution demands the development of processes of care. An important question is how much money will process improvement save? I estimate that this process improvement could save an estimated 7 to 10% of the healthcare dollar.

The real question should be focused on how to repair the healthcare system by decreasing costs while improving the health of Americans.

This problem is not only about hospitals and medical practices reimbursement. It is about problems created by all the stakeholders. It is about aligning all the stakeholders’ incentives. The solutions to the healthcare system’s dysfunction must be initiated at the same time. You cannot try to fix one problem because it will result in a problem getting worse in another area.

The key to the solutions is to incentivize consumers of healthcare to control their health and be in charge of their healthcare dollars. Consumers can force secondary stakeholders to adjust swiftly to their demands and make them compete for consumers’ healthcare dollars.

Consumers must have incentive. They should be able to keep anything they do not spend of the first $7500 dollars of healthcare coverage. In our present healthcare system consumers do not control their healthcare dollars. They get first dollar coverage with variable deductible expenses. If the deductible is too high they will avoid necessary care and medications.

Society should not want that to happen because patients will get sicker and cost more to treat. Third party payers control the healthcare dollar. This control has contributed to increase the cost of healthcare. .

Some claim the only incentive consumers (patients) should need is to maintain their health. This claim has turned out not to be true.

Where do all the healthcare dollars go?

1. 65% of each healthcare dollar goes to the healthcare insurance industry for overhead for administrative services and insurance reserves whether it is private or government insurance.

image

2. Only 35% of the healthcare dollar is actually spent on medical care.

3. 80% of the healthcare dollars spent for medical care is spent by 20% of the people.

4. Most of those 20% have chronic diseases.

5. 80% of those dollars are spent on the complications of their chronic diseases.

6. Some claim there is 40% waste in the healthcare system due to uncoordinated care and duplication of care.

7. Much of the excess testing is due to the fear of malpractice claims and the practice of defensive medicine.

Let us follow the healthcare dollars with consumers being in control of their healthcare dollar.

If a moderate size company of 67 employees were willing to pay $15,000 dollars per employee for healthcare insurance it would cost $1,000,000 dollars. If the employer did not provide healthcare insurance the government penalty ($2,000 per employee) would be $134,000 dollars. This would represent a savings to this moderate sized company of $866,000 dollars per year. It would be the logical path to take. The formula I propose will work for the individual buying insurance.

Assume employers were willing to buy healthcare insurance for their employees. They would put $7,500 per year in a trust for each employee. The employee would be responsible for his healthcare dollars. The fees would be pre-negotiated fees by the government as the healthcare insurance industry does presently with physicians and hospitals. Hospitals and physicians might even want to compete among each other for the consumers’ dollars.

If the employee did not spend all the healthcare dollars in a year the remaining dollars would go into his retirement fund. It would not be used for future medical care.

A new equation for driving healthcare costs would be born.

There would not be a 65% overhead for administrative services for the first $7500 dollars because the healthcare insurance industry would not be administering the first $7500 dollars. The savings would be $4875 dollars.

Patients and physicians would have an additional $4875 dollars working toward direct medical care. The 65% overhead for administrative services for the remaining $7,500 of high deductible coverage could remain the same. The high deductible insurance would provide first dollar coverage after $7,500. The risk to the healthcare insurance industry would be less and so its insurance reserves could be less.

The government pays the same amount for administrative services to the healthcare insurance industry. The government could use the same formula for Medicare and Medicaid.

Consumers would have a monetary incentive to decrease their risk of getting sick (preventing obesity and increasing exercise). If consumers drove the healthcare system the consumption of snack foods and fast foods would decrease with proper education. Those fast food companies would be forced to sell healthy food to stay in business. Consumer would be driven by monetary incentives to stay healthy.

The onset of chronic disease would decrease. The complications of chronic disease would also decrease.

If a patient had a chronic disease at the onset of this new system and controlled their disease well in order to avoid acute and chronic complications of the chronic disease the healthcare system could reward them with a bonus at the end of the year. They would avoid costly hospitalizations.

Consumers would demand and pay to be properly educated to avoid complications of their chronic disease

An added benefit is that there would be less doctor visits and hospitalizations. This would increase healthcare capacity. It would enable the country to provide care for the entire population rather that force the healthcare system to abs
orb additional patients and create shortages resulting in rationing and decreasing access to care.

When people are motive by monetary incentives they are innovative. Innovation stimulates efficiency and decreases costs. It is important to have consumers be responsible for themselves and not dependent on the government.

The opinions expressed in the blog “Repairing The Healthcare System” are, mine and mine alone.

Permalink:

What Healthcare Reform Will Mean For You?

Stanley Feld M.D.,FACP,MACE

Democrats are cheerful on this beautiful spring morning. They are happy because congress finally passed this partisan healthcare reform bill. Many are going to try to represent the vote to the traditional media as a great duty to the American people. I also believe they have no idea of the unintended consequence of President Obama’s healthcare reform bill.

The high level goals of the healthcare reform bill are commendable. The bill’s solutions will end in disaster for taxpayers, the government, and patients who need medical care.

I received a comment from a lawyer this morning.

I can’t imagine what is going to happen with this new healthcare bill.  Decrease payment to doctors, increase number of patients… hmmm.

Also, can you imagine how happy you are if you are a plaintiff’s lawyer?  Less time per patient means more chances of mistake. And just more folks in the system filing bogus claims, too. Total win for the lawyers.

It is also a big win for the healthcare insurance industry, and big pharma . I predict their stock prices will increase in the next weeks.

President Obama’s healthcare reform bill is a big loss for taxpayers and people who are ill and people who are not ill.

The details of the bill are a killer of innovation, jobs creation, and freedom of choice. The bill will increase taxes and decrease quality of medical care. Many of the bill’s benefits will not start until 2014. The increase in taxes will start this year,2010.

President Obama has said: Any one making under $200,000 per year will not pay a penny in increased taxes.

The Joint Committee on Taxation analysis contradicts President Obama’s assertion. Either the congress or the President does not believe the Joint Committee on Taxation or has chosen to ignore it.

 clip_image002 

The healthcare reform bill will increase Medicaid roles. This will increase burdens on State budgets. Most States have budget deficits. They are required to have balanced budgets.

The Medicaid expansion might be meaningless because of the level of income required for coverage.

If you’re low-income: The law significantly expands Medicaid, the federal-state health program for the poor, making it available to an estimated 16 million more people with incomes up to 133% of the federal poverty level.”

The poverty level was defined in 1955. In Texas poverty is defined as earning less than $950 per month or $11,400 per year. The increase will raise the level to $15,162 per year. How can a person making $20,000 dollars a year afford a $15,000 dollar healthcare policy even if the government subsides 50% of it? A tax credit is meaningless because they do not pay taxes.

This is an example of one of the many non starters in the healthcare reform bill. On the increased taxes side I believe the healthcare reform bill will inhibit investment and economic growth.

A new 3.8% Medicare tax will be levied on investment income including interest, dividends and capital gains that exceed those thresholds.

President Obama’s strategy is to increase taxes. Americans might notice the increased tax burden shortly. The increased taxes could be significant to a moderate earner’s lifestyle and standard of living.

  • If you itemize deductions for income tax: Starting in 2013, medical expenses have to reach 10% of your adjusted gross income to qualify for a tax deduction, as opposed to today’s 7.5% standard. But seniors age 65 and older would be able to claim an itemized deduction at 7.5% of income through 2016.

There is much talk about the Cadillac tax. There is little understanding of the rules. If the average healthcare insurance policy for an individual is going to rise as the healthcare insurance industry predicts, how is anyone going to be able to afford the insurance much less the excise tax?

This will precipitate the Public Option. What effect will the Public Option have on the bogus deficit reduction calculations?

Willie Sutton’s advice is to go where the money is. President Obama is not going where the money is.

The money is in:

1. Creating a system that puts consumers in control of their healthcare dollars and their health.

2. Rewarding consumers for good health.

3. Promoting self-responsibility for their health and healthcare dollars.

4. Creating a system that decreases defensive medicine.

5. Instituting effective and significant Tort Reform to decrease the need for defensive medicine

6. Creating a system that decreases the cost of adopting functional electronic medical records. An ideal medical record should be available to all at minimal monthly cost based on utilization.

7. Providing effective patient educational tutorials using the internet that is a physician approved extension of his care. Patients with chronic diseases must become professors of their disease. If they do not the complications of the chronic disease will occur and consume 80% of the healthcare dollars.

8. Creating systems of care that will prevent and reduce complications of chronic disease.

President Obama’s healthcare reform bill does not deal with any of these cost saving ideas effectively.

Americans love their country. We also know our government has done some stupid things in the past. The healthcare reform bill’s mistakes have been driven by politics, by ideology, by the influence of vested interests, and by the desire for power and fame .

President Obama’s healthcare reform bill is a stupid bill. America will suffer economically from the unintended consequences in the years to come.

The opinions expressed in the blog “Repairing The Healthcare System” are, mine and mine alone.

Permalink:

Watch Out!! Obamacare 5.0 And The Healthcare Insurance Industry

Stanley Feld M.D.,FACP,MACE

Ann Braly’s (CEO of WellPoint), article in the Wall Street Journal on February 7, 2007 and the announcement of a 37% increase in healthcare insurance premiums by California’s Anthem Blue Cross(a WellPoint affiliate) illustrates several points.

  1. The healthcare insurance industry wants Obamacare’s mandated insurance so it can service more enrollees.
  2. It is easier to hate the healthcare insurance industry more than Obamacare
  3. President Obama is able to ride in on his white horse and save Americans from the evil healthcare insurance industry.

Who wins?

  1. The healthcare insurance industry.
  2. The President and his goal to increase government. control over our lives and freedom.

Who losses? American citizens

1. Increasing government control over one-sixth of our economy

2. Increasing taxes in different ways.

3. Decreasing freedom to choose.

4. Restricting access to care.

5. Rationing medical care.

6. Infringement on our constitutional rights.

The healthcare insurance industry controls the healthcare system. It sets insurance premiums using defective accounting systems to determine an exaggerated overhead.

The States and their State Insurance Board control licenses to sell insurance. State Insurance Boards have not acted in the citizens’ interest in many states.

All the California State Insurance Board has to do is refuse Anthem Blue Cross a license to sell insurance in California. Anthem Blue Cross would lose 800,000 enrollees.

The healthcare insurance industry is the administrative service vendor for Medicare and Medicaid. The fees government pays to the healthcare industry are excessive.

The healthcare industry believes it adds value to medical care of patients.

The reason costs are rising so fast, Mrs. Braly says, is because the way the health-care market is structured doesn’t give providers reason to control costs. The solution is to "reintroduce the consumer to the health-care equation," and on that front, she believes, insurers "are actually the part of the health-care delivery system that is there to create the value."

This is an important statement. Medical care is the relationship between patients and physicians. All the other stakeholders are secondary stakeholders. In Repairing the Healthcare System the most important issue to be resolved is how do you provide incentives to patients and physicians to control costs?

The solution is that consumers have to drive the healthcare system not healthcare insurance industry.

Government control of the healthcare system will not control costs. Programs that penalize physicians and patients will not control costs.

Patients can control costs and quality with the appropriate educational infrastructure. At present most patients choose their physician by word of mouth.

Healthcare costs can be controlled by consumers controlling their healthcare dollars. .

“Mrs. Braly thinks patients will make more cost-conscious decisions if they have the incentives and the tools—namely, the information about cost and quality that is the basis of any ordinary market. "Data just sitting there is not helpful, and its got to be meaningful, provided to the doctor and the patient in a meaningful way," she says. Far from simply being a bill-paying outfit or a hedge against risk, she sees WellPoint’s fundamental role as making "the health dollar more valuable, less wasteful, more efficient."

Mrs. Braly knows her company owns the healthcare dollar. She wants patients and physicians to be directed by her company to be more efficient. If they are they will be more valuable to her company’s bottom line.

I do not think she will reduce premiums. . I think increased efficiency will result in greater profits for WellPoint. Consumers have to be incentivized to be responsible for their health and healthcare. This is the only way you will reduce costs and decrease premiums. The government trying to force cost reductions will fail.

I do not think President Obama realizes he is being set up by the healthcare insurance industry. He believes he is setting the healthcare insurance industry up.

He has refused the Republican offer for a bipartisan effort at healthcare reform. It is almost as if he and the healthcare insurance industry are playing bad cop, good cop at the expense of the American people.

President Obama published Obamacare 5.0 on Monday four days before his so called bipartisan healthcare summit. His proposal is almost a duplicate of the Senate bill.

Michael Connelly, a retired constitutional lawyer, wrote a dynamite review of President Obama’s proposal which he dubbed Obamacare 5.0.

“After much anticipation, at least by the so-called mainstream media, the White House has released the new and improved version of Obamacare.

Since I have already had to read two previous versions of these monstrosities in the House and two more in the Senate, I call this version Obamacare 5.0 and it is actually an easy read.

It is not hundreds or thousands of pages long and it doesn’t take long for people to realize that it really changes very little.”

The President’s proposal makes the bill more palatable to the American public because he camouflages the implications.

“Some members of Congress have grown increasingly more concerned about the implications that these proposals have for freedom in this country. In that regard the proposal fails miserably.

This is all an attempt to hide the fact that the bill is still blatantly unconstitutional.”

Michael Connelly points out that President Obama’s proposal exceeds the authority granted to Congress in Article 1 Section 8 of the Constitution. It also violates the 9th and 10th amendments that protect the rights of people and the states.

His article is clear and precise. The critical details should be a wakeup call to all Americans. It is a must read.

I believe that President Obama’s proposal is in fact a ruse. It is designed to lure us into believing that the health care bill is actually about affordable health care when it is really about taking control of our lives and limiting our freedoms.

It is a cover for the fact that the Senate will try to pass this bill as a “budget reconciliation act” that will only require a simple majority in the Senate instead of the usual 60 votes.

We must act now to let our representatives in the House and Senate know that we are not buying
into these deceptions and that they will pay a price in November at the polls if this is forced on us.

During Nancy Pelosi’s call to action, she said if necessary they would parachute in and pass the bill.

President Obama’s proposal is a way to get a healthcare bill passed. If it passes it will cost Americans dearly. At this point he wants to pass any bill for the sake of saying he passed a healthcare reform bill.

His present proposal is the same as the terrible Senate bill. He will fail because he makes no attempt to be bipartisan.

The opinions expressed in the blog “Repairing The Healthcare System” are, mine and mine alone.

Permalink:

A Call To Action : Take Back Your Healthcare: Part 1

Stanley Feld M.D.,FACP,MACE

Consumers and physicians are starting to fighting to stop President Obama’s misguided healthcare plan as witnessed by the protests throughout the country. Once the American public became aware of the implications of the public option and the costs of the plan they began to distrust President Obama.

On Friday afternoon August 22nd at 4 p.m. on a hot summer afternoon when everyone was heading for the beach the administration announced the budget deficit was going to be greater than previously predicted.

It is easy to cook the books by making the wrong assumptions for your calculations. Massachusetts cooked the books with its universal healthcare plan and it has failed. President Obama’s healthcare plan is destined to fail just as Massachusetts’ plan.

Now, Massachusetts is discontinuing its universal healthcare plan. It is creating another plan that will bankrupt the state even further. Massachusetts has already received an $8 billion dollar bailout from the federal government.

Another failure is coming up at taxpayers’ expense. I am publishing the follow essay from a reader who would prefer to remain anonymous.

It is a call to action. The first two parts will be educational.

                            Consumers: Take Back Your Health CARE.

It’s too important to be trusted to either insurance companies or the government

The BOGUS Schemes proposed by Washington & Massachusetts EXPOSED

Definitions

Health insurance is not health CARE.

Health CARE is what your Doctor does for you.

Health insurance is nothing more than an Insurer’s promise (however slippery) to pay someone else (a doctor / nurse / PT, etc.) to give you CARE.

Yet Congress ignores this fact. Congress is trying to force more insurance on people, when it is CARE everyone really wants to buy.

Insurers have very successfully driven down payment to Doctors, year after year throughout the past twenty years, taking advantage of the fact that Doctors’ practices are small businesses. Many Doctors practice by themselves. This is smaller than small. Practicing medicine is a cottage industry.

No Doctor’s practice meets the definition of a monopoly – no Doctor has 40% or more of Consumers as his / her patients.

Today, Health CARE is not expensive.

But Health Insurance is.

Various Insurers do have a monopoly in many markets throughout the US, and they have used their monopoly power to crush many medical practices.

Yet Insurers have never passed their savings through to Consumers, and state governments have been their accomplices.

States have allowed and in some cases encouraged Insurers to become monopolies. Therein is the root of the out-of-control health insurance cost problem.

Now, some in Massachusetts want to make even more monopoly the law.

After feeding Insurers for years, by requiring every citizen of Massachusetts to become a customer of a health insurance company, Massachusetts finally acknowledged that requiring everyone to buy insurance has done nothing to control cost.

So one month ago, Massachusetts repealed its Universal Healthcare law and turned its attention to the matter of cost control.

Enter Massachusetts’s Health Care Reform Commission, which has proposed that Massachusetts make it illegal for its citizens to deal directly with their doctors and illegal for their doctors to be paid except by Accountable Care Organizations (hospital systems / co-operatives that will assume all financial risk for all care, including physicians, hospital charges and prescription drugs). The Reform Commission wants Massachusetts to effectively outlaw the private practice of Medicine and herd everyone into massive institutions such as the health care co-operatives currently under consideration in Washington.

The Reform Commission wants Massachusetts to pass a law requiring all doctors to become employees of huge hospital systems and be paid an Insurer-dictated “global payment” (capitation).

Doctors, nurses, and allied health practitioners would all now be forced to work for Big Hospitals, which effectively work for Insurance Companies, and not the patient.

Remember the Health Maintenance Organizations of the 1980’s and 1990’s? The healthcare insurance industry profited greatly. Patients experience decrease in access to care and physicians suffered from restrictions to provide adequate care.

Patients and physicians are the weakest link in the healthcare chain even though they are the primary stakeholders.

All politicians have to do is create a complicated plan to “help” the poor, spin a tail about it being the solution, pass a bill and you have created a money making machine for the healthcare insurance industry at the expense of patients.

This is exactly what is happening in Massachusetts all over again.

The opinions expressed in the blog “Repairing The Healthcare System” are, mine and mine alone.